分类： 时尚中坑

恶搞——国内银行的缩写

中国建设银行——CBC(Construction Bank of China)——“存不存？”
中国银行　　——BC（Bank of China）——“不存。”
中国农业银行——ABC(Agriculture Bank of China)——“啊，不存”
中国工商银行——ICBC(Industryand Commercial Bank of China)——“爱存不存”
民生银行　　——CMSB（china minsheng bank）——“存吗？傻比”
招商银行　　——CMBC——“存吗？？白痴！”
兴业银行　　——CIB——“存一百”
国家开发银行——(CHINA DEVELOPMENT BANK):CDB——存点吧！”
北京市商业银行——BCC (BBEIJING CITY COMMERCIAL BANK)——白存存不？”
汇丰银行　　——（HSBC）还是不存”

道德测试

http://www.philosophersmag.com/bw/games/taboo.htm

在网上一个blog上面偶尔看到，顺便去做了一下：

我的结果是：

Taboo – The Results
Results

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.80.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.60.

Your Universalising Factor is: 1.00.

上面三个参数的解释是：

Your Moralising Quotient is an aggregate measure of your tendency to condemn the actions described in these scenarios as morally wrong. A score of 1.00 indicates a fully moralising position. A score of 0.00 is a fully permissive response. (See below for more on these.)

Your Interference Factor is an aggregate measure of your tendency to judge the actions described here as being the legitimate target of societal interference in the form of prevention or punishment. A score of 1.00 indicates that you think that every act described in these scenarios is subject to societal interference. A score of 0.00 indicates that you think that these acts are essentially a private matter, and that societal interference is inappropriate.

Your Universalising Factor is an aggregate measure of your tendency to judge moral wrongdoing in universal terms. A score of 1.00 means that every time you have determined one of the acts depicted in these scenarios to be morally wrong, you have universalised the judgement of moral wrongoing; that is, you have indicated that the act is wrong regardless of prevailing cultural norms and social conventions. A score of 0.00, on the other hand, means that where you see moral wrong in the acts depicted in these scenarios, you have not once universalised the judgement of moral wrongdoing; that is, you have indicated that whether an act is to be thought of as wrong is largely a matter of social norms, and that it is quite possible that what is wrong in one culture may not be wrong in another. A score of -1 means that you saw no moral wrong in any of the activities depicted in these scenarios, and so it is not possible for this activity to determine the extent to which you see moral wrongdoing in universal terms.

Hotmail邮箱升级成25M的漏洞已经不管用了

前两天还想帮LP升级她的msn，发现按照以前的流程已经不行了，多了个Verizon的认证过不了。估计是M$封住了。

今天我的msn邮箱收到了M$的一封信:

Dear Customer,

This mail is confirmation that your subscription to Verizon Online DSL with MSN Premium has been cancelled on Monday, April 12, 2004.

If you have questions about this cancellation or if you would like to re-activate your subscription, contact Customer Support.
。。。

呵呵呵，看来微软封堵这个漏洞了，幸好现在邮箱还是25M，不要封掉我的邮箱就好。